The Ancient exoplanet discovery boosts chances of finding alien life

An artist's impression of the oldest known system of terrestrial-sized planets, Kepler-444. Tiago Campante/Peter Devine, University of Birmingham, Author provided Credit: By Daniel Huber, Astronomer at University of Sydney

One of the crucial variables in calculating the likelihood that alien life exists elsewhere in our galaxy is the number of stars that possess planetary systems, and the proportion of those planets that might be suitable for life.

So the discovery of no less than five sub-Earth-sized exoplanets orbiting an ancient star, Kepler-444, which is not too distant from our own solar system, has significant ramifications for the possibility we might one day run into ET.

Formed over 11-billion years ago, the Kepler-444 system proves that such small planets have existed through most of the history of our universe. And the more small planets that exist, the higher the chances that one of them (or one of their moons) might sit in the so-called “Goldilocks zone” that enables life to exist.

This remarkable discovery was made possible not only by the space-based NASA Kepler telescope but also a technique called asteroseismology.

Kepler continuously measured the brightness of more than 150,000 stars for four years. As planets orbit in front of the stellar disc they cause small dips in the brightness of the star, yielding information on the planet’s orbital period and size relative to the size of their host star.

More than 1,800 exoplanets have been discovered to date, including some Earth-sized planets in the habitable zone. Such discoveries have demonstrated that planets with favourable conditions for life may actually be common.

But the age of the host stars – and therefore the age of the planets – was often unknown. This is because the clues that give a hint to the age of a star tend to be hidden beneath its visible surface.

Using asteroseismology to date a star

An artist’s impression of Kepler-10, illustrating the paths of sound waves in the stellar interior which can be used to determine the fundamental properties – including age – of planet host stars. Gabriel Perez Diaz, Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias

Fortunately, the variability in the brightness of stars offers a way to resolve this problem using asteroseismology.

Stars with similar and cooler temperatures than our sun transport energy to their surface through the up-flow and down-flow of gas that flows due to the interplay of buoyancy and gravity. The turbulent motion of the gas excites pressure waves to travel through the stellar interior.

The frequency of these waves – also referred to as oscillations – are determined by the sound speed, which in turn depends on the stellar interior structure and composition.

These oscillations also travel to different depths within the star, thereby offering a way to probe the structure by observing the oscillations. As the core properties of the star change with time, such changes are imprinted in the oscillation frequency patterns.

Conveniently, we can measure stellar oscillations using the same data we use to discover transiting planets. Thus we were able to use asteroseismology to study a fascinating planetary system in exquisite detail and to determine the age of the host star.


Kepler-444: An ancient laboratory for planetary and stellar astrophysics

Comparison of the sizes of inner solar system planets to the planets discovered in the Kepler-444 system. Daniel Huber & NASA

Unlike our solar system, however, the Kepler-444 planets orbit their host star in less than 10 days. Even taking into account the cooler temperature of Kepler-444 compared to our sun, this places these ancient planets well outside the habitable zone.

Despite the rather hostile environment, Kepler-444 marks an important milestone to understand whether life may be common outside the solar system. While the Kepler mission has previously demonstrated that small planets are abundant, Kepler-444 proves that such planets have formed for most of the history of our universe.

If life can form on Earth-sized planets in the habitable zone of other stars, this implies that it may have formed on distant planets long before life emerged here on Earth.

Source: University of Sydney

SOHO and Hinode Offer New Insight Into Solar Eruptions

Scientists are trying to understand the precise details of what creates giant explosions in the sun's atmosphere, such as this solar eruption from Oct. 14, 2012, as seen by NASA's Solar Dynamic Observatory. Image Credit: NASA/SDO/Amari

The sun is home to the largest explosions in the solar system. For example, it regularly produces huge eruptions known as coronal mass ejections – when billions of tons of solar material erupt off the sun, spewing into space and racing toward the very edges of the solar system. Scientists know that these ejections, called CMEs, are caused by magnetic energy building up on the sun, which suddenly releases. But the details of what causes the build up and triggers the release are not precisely understood.

A journal paper in Nature magazine on Oct. 23, 2014, used data from NASA missions to present an example of how something called a magnetic flux rope builds up over time until it is so unstable that even the slightest perturbation will send it flying. Understanding what triggers CMEs is crucial not only for better understanding of our sun, but also to lay the groundwork for predicting when such giant explosions might happen.

"We looked at a well-studied CME from 2006," said Tahar Amari first author on the Nature paper at Ecole Polytechnique in France. "We knew that there had been a great deal of data available for this CME and much analysis already done, but no one had created a comprehensive picture of what happened."

Amari and his colleagues used a traditional meteorology technique to examine the event: Gather observations from the days before the CME to track how the event grew over time. They used observations from the European Space Agency and NASA's Solar and Heliospheric Observatory, or SOHO, and the Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency and NASA's Hinode, as well as from the Paris-Meudon Observatory.

Scientists created this model to examine the magnetic field before a giant solar eruption – a coronal mass ejection – which occurred on Dec. 13, 2006. The orange lines show magnetic field lines. The grey line represents what's called a flux rope, which built up the day before the event. Image Credit: Amari/Ecole Poytechnique

The team wanted to see if they could distinguish between two broad theories about how the magnetic energy develops. The first model describes a situation in which a series of loops of magnetic fields on the sun – known as an arcade – is the start of every active region CME. 

This arcade has a weak point at the top, a place where the energy from below can burst through once it's great enough. During the eruption a flux rope forms, which can be seen inside the CME as it surges away from the sun.

The second model assumes that the flux rope is there before the CME erupts. In this theory, no weak point is required. Instead, the flux rope gains more and more energy, and becomes increasingly unstable until a disturbance on the sun causes it to release the energy out into space.

Amari and his team used magnetic data from the surface obtained by Hinode, but they also needed magnetic data for the sun's atmosphere, the corona, which is strongly affected by its magnetic field.

"The corona is so hot that most of the techniques to measure the magnetic field don't work," said Amari. "So we developed an efficient and accurate model to compute the magnetic field there, based on the data we had from the surface, and the equations governing the physics of the low corona above active regions."

With these two data sets in hand, the team examined what happened in the four days before the 2006 CME erupted. They could see the magnetic energy building; it was clear something was emerging. Only, however, on the last day did a flux rope develop and only then did it have enough energy built up to power a CME eruption. At this point, some small disruption was enough of a nudge to make the flux rope erupt.

A model of the eruption of a giant magnetic rope that led to a coronal mass ejection on the sun in December 2006.

A model of the eruption of a giant magnetic rope that led to a coronal mass ejection on the sun in December 2006. The model showed that magnetic fields built up for several days before the eruption.

"In this case no weak point up in the atmosphere was needed to allow the energy to be released," said Amari. "There is, instead, a kind of critical value of energy, a value we can compute based on seeing an active magnetic region on the sun. Beneath that value the magnetic field will stay quiet. Above that, it is likely to erupt. There is also a critical height for rising flux rope, beyond which the magnetic loops above can no longer keep it confined."

The team explored the initial conditions from this event and put the information into another dynamical model the team had developed. The simulation mirrored what was actually seen, with an eruption occurring only when the critical energy and height were reached on the last day.

Amari points out that just because this CME contained a flux rope prior to eruption, it doesn't mean that other CMEs can’t erupt based on other physical catalysts. But it clearly describes one mechanism that is at work on the sun.

By measuring and calculating the magnetic fields on the sun, coupled with determining how to measure the critical tipping point where a CME can erupt, the paper offers new ways to determine the possibility of eruption from any given active area on the sun.

Source: Nasa

Solar photons drive water off the moon

Lunar sample in vacuum. A lunar sample in a ultra-high vacuum system is hit with ultraviolet (157 nm) photons to simulate conditions in space. Credit: Image courtesy of Georgia Institute of Technology

Water is thought to be embedded in the moon's rocks or, if cold enough, "stuck" on their surfaces. It's predominantly found at the poles. But scientists probably won't find it intact on the sunlit side.

New research at the Georgia Institute of Technology indicates that ultraviolet photons emitted by the sun likely cause H2O molecules to either quickly desorb or break apart. The fragments of water may remain on the lunar surface, but the presence of useful amounts of water on the sunward side is not likely.

The Georgia Tech team built an ultra-high vacuum system that simulates conditions in space, then performed the first-ever reported measurement of the water photodesorption cross section from an actual lunar sample. The machine zapped a small piece of the moon with ultraviolet (157 nm) photons to create excited states and watched what happened to the water molecules. They either came off with a cross section of ~ 6 x 10−19 cm2 or broke apart with a cross section of ~ 5 x 10−19 cm2.. According to the team's measurements, approximately one in every 1,000 molecules leave the lunar surface simply due to absorption of UV light.

Georgia Tech's cross section values can now be used by scientists attempting to find water throughout the solar system and beyond.

"The cross section is an important number planetary scientists, astrochemists and the astrophysics community need for models regarding the fate of water on comets, moons, asteroids, other airless bodies and interstellar grains," said Thomas Orlando, the Georgia Tech professor who led the study.

The number is relatively large, which establishes that solar UV photons are likely removing water from the moon's surface. This research, which was carried out primarily by former Georgia Tech Ph.D. student Alice DeSimone, indicates the cross sections increase even more with decreasing water coverage. That's why it's not likely that water remains intact as H2O on the sunny side of the moon. Orlando compares it to sitting outside on a summer day.

"If a lot of sunlight is hitting me, the probability of me getting sunburned is pretty high," said Orlando, a professor in the School of Chemistry and Biochemistry and School of Physics. "It's similar on the moon. There's a fixed solar flux of energetic photons that hit the sunlit surface, and there's a pretty good probability they remove water or damage the molecules."

The result, according to Orlando, is the release of molecules such as H2O, H2 and OH as well as the atomic fragments H and O. The research is published in two companion articles in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets. The first discusses the water photodesorption. The second paper details the photodissociation of water and the O(3PJ) formation on a lunar impact melt breccia.

Orlando is the associate director of Georgia Tech's Center for Space Technology and Research (C-STAR). C-STAR is an interdisciplinary research center that serves to organize, integrate and facilitate the impact of Georgia Tech's space science and space technology research activities. The center brings together a wide range of Georgia Tech faculty, active in space science and space technology research, and functions as the Institute's focal point for growth of the space industry in the state of Georgia.

Source: Georgia Institute of Technology