EGFR-Mediated Beclin 1 Phosphorylation in Autophagy Suppression, Tumor Progression, and Tumor Chemoresistance

EGFR negatively regulates autophagy by binding to Beclin 1.
Active EGFR phosphorylates Beclin 1 and alters its interactome.
EGFR suppression of Beclin 1 may contribute to tumor progression in lung cancer.

Lung cancer responses to EGFR inhibitors may involve activation of Beclin 1. Image Credit: Cell Press

Summary
Cell surface growth factor receptors couple environmental cues to the regulation of cytoplasmic homeostatic processes, including autophagy, and aberrant activation of such receptors is a common feature of human malignancies. Here, we defined the molecular basis by which the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase regulates autophagy. Active EGFR binds the autophagy protein Beclin 1, leading to its multisite tyrosine phosphorylation, enhanced binding to inhibitors, and decreased Beclin 1-associated VPS34 kinase activity. EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy disrupts Beclin 1 tyrosine phosphorylation and binding to its inhibitors and restores autophagy in non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) cells with a TKI-sensitive EGFR mutation. In NSCLC tumor xenografts, the expression of a tyrosine phosphomimetic Beclin 1 mutant leads to reduced autophagy, enhanced tumor growth, tumor dedifferentiation, and resistance to TKI therapy. Thus, oncogenic receptor tyrosine kinases directly regulate the core autophagy machinery, which may contribute to tumor progression and chemoresistance.

Introduction
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), an oncogenic receptor tyrosine kinase, links extracellular signals to cellular homeostasis. In normal cells, EGFR signaling is triggered by the binding of growth factors, such as epidermal growth factor (EGF), leading to homodimerization or heterodimerization with other EGFR family members (such as HER2/neu) and autophosphorylation of the intracellular domain (Lemmon and Schlessinger, 2010). The phosphotyrosines formed serve as a docking site for adaptor molecules, which results in the activation of signaling pathways including the Ras/MAPK pathway, the PI3K/Akt pathway, and STAT signaling pathways. In tumor cells, the tyrosine kinase activity of EGFR may be dysregulated by EGFR gene mutation, increased EGFR gene copy number, or EGFR protein overexpression, leading to aberrant EGFR signaling and increased tumor cell survival, proliferation, invasion, and metastasis ( Ciardiello and Tortora, 2008). EGFR signaling is deregulated in many human cancers, including those of the lung, head and neck, colon, pancreas, and brain.

The deregulation of EGFR in human cancers has led to the development of anticancer agents that target EGFR, including: (1) anti-EGFR antibodies that inhibit ligand binding and (2) small-molecule receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), erlotinib and gefitinib, that block EGFR intracellular tyrosine kinase activity. Although the EGFR TKIs have shown limited clinical benefit in the majority of solid tumors, they are effective in non-small-cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs) that harbor specific mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain of EGFR (most commonly, in-frame deletion in exon 19 around codons 746–750 or single-base substitution, L858R, in exon 21) (Ciardiello and Tortora, 2008, Lynch et al., 2004 and Pao and Chmielecki, 2010). Most patients with NSCLCs with EGFR mutations initially respond favorably to erlotinib or gefitinib, suggesting these mutations drive tumorigenesis. However, among tumors that initially respond to EGFR TKIs, most eventually acquire resistance, often due to the emergence of a secondary mutation, T790M, in the kinase domain of EGFR (Pao and Chmielecki, 2010).

Several studies have shown that EGFR signaling regulates autophagy, a lysosomal degradation pathway that functions in cellular homeostasis and protection against a variety of diseases, including cancer (Levine and Kroemer, 2008). The downstream targets of EGFR—PI3K, Akt, and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)—are well-established negative regulators of autophagy (Botti et al., 2006). Moreover, EGFR inhibitors induce autophagy in NSCLCs (Gorzalczany et al., 2011 and Han et al., 2011) and other cancer cells (Fung et al., 2012). However, the links between EGFR signaling and autophagy remain poorly understood, particularly (1) the molecular mechanisms by which EGFR signaling suppresses autophagy, (2) the role of EGFR suppression of autophagy in lung cancer pathogenesis, and (3) the role of autophagy induction in the response to TKI therapy. EGFR inhibitor-induced autophagy in lung cancer cells has been postulated to exert either cytoprotective (Han et al., 2011) or cytotoxic (Gorzalczany et al., 2011) effects.

Conflicting results regarding the role of autophagy in the response or resistance to EGFR TKI treatment reflects broader uncertainties in the role of autophagy in cancer therapy (Rubinsztein et al., 2012). It is not understood in what contexts autophagy induction contributes to tumor progression or suppression and to tumor chemoresistance or chemosensitivity. There is a general consensus that autophagy prevents tumor initiation, as loss-of-function mutations of several different autophagy genes results in spontaneous tumorigenesis (beclin 1, Atg5, and Atg7) and/or increased chemical-induced tumorigenesis (Atg4C) in mice ( Rubinsztein et al., 2012). Despite this inhibitory role in tumor initiation, it has been proposed that autophagy may promote the growth of established tumors and contribute to chemoresistance, principally through its actions to prolong the survival of metabolically stressed neoplastic cells ( Rubinsztein et al., 2012).

To understand the relationship between oncogenic signaling, autophagy, and distinct stages of tumorigenesis, it is important to define the molecular mechanisms by which oncogenic signaling regulates autophagy. We recently showed that the oncogene Akt inhibits autophagy independently of mTOR signaling via serine phosphorylation of the essential autophagy protein, Beclin 1 (Wang et al., 2012), a haploinsufficient tumor suppressor protein frequently monoallelically deleted in human breast and ovarian cancer (Levine and Kroemer, 2008). Moreover, Akt-mediated phosphorylation of Beclin 1 contributes to Akt-dependent fibroblast transformation, supporting the concept that inactivation of Beclin 1-dependent autophagy plays a role in tumor initiation. However, it is not known whether oncogenic inactivation of Beclin 1 (or other autophagy proteins) influences progression of established tumors and/or their response to therapy.


Here, we identify the molecular basis by which EGFR tyrosine kinase activity regulates autophagy. We show that active EGFR binds to Beclin 1, leading to its tyrosine phosphorylation, alteration of its interactome, and inhibition of its autophagy function. A mutant of Beclin 1 containing phosphomimetic mutations in the EGFR-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation sites enhances autophagy suppression in EGFR-mutated NSCLC cells, resulting in enhanced tumor progression, altered tumor cell differentiation, and partial tumor resistance to EGFR TKI therapy. These findings demonstrate a heretofore unknown link between oncogenic receptor tyrosine kinases and the autophagy machinery, which may contribute to tumor progression and resistance to targeted therapy.

Source: Full Artical At - CELL PRESS

Stanford bioengineers develop tool for reprogramming genetic code

Stanford bioengineers have developed a new tool that allows them to preferentially activate or deactivate genes in living cells. VITSTUDIO/SHUTTERSTOCK

Biology relies upon the precise activation of specific genes to work properly. If that sequence gets out of whack, or one gene turns on only partially, the outcome can often lead to a disease.

Now, bioengineers at Stanford and other universities have developed a sort of programmable genetic code that allows them to preferentially activate or deactivate genes in living cells. The work is published in the current issue of Cell, and could help usher in a new generation of gene therapies.

The technique is an adaptation of CRISPR, itself a relatively new genetic tool that makes use of a natural defense mechanism that bacteria evolved over millions of years to slice up infectious virus DNA.

Standard CRISPR consists of two components: a short RNA that matches a particular spot in the genome, and a protein called Cas9 that snips the DNA in that location. For the purposes of gene editing, scientists can control where the protein snips the genome, insert a new gene into the cut and patch it back together.

Inserting new genetic code, however, is just one way to influence how the genome is expressed. Another involves telling the cell how much or how little to activate a particular gene, thus controlling how much protein a cell produces from that gene and altering its behavior.

It's this action that Lei Stanley Qi, an assistant professor of bioengineering and of chemical and systems biology at Stanford, and his colleagues aim to manipulate.

Influencing the genome
In the new work, the researchers describe how they have designed the CRISPR molecule to include a second piece of information on the RNA, instructing the molecule to either increase (upregulate) or decrease (downregulate) a target gene's activity, or turn it on/off entirely.

Additionally, they designed it so that it could affect two different genes at once. In a cell, the order or degree in which multiple genes are activated can produce different metabolic products.

"It's like driving a car. You control the wheel to control direction, and the engine to control the speed, and how you balance the two determines how the car moves," Qi said. "We can do the same thing in the cell by up- or downregulating genes, and produce different outcomes."

As a proof of principle, the scientists used the technique to take control of a yeast metabolic pathway, turning genes on and off in various orders to produce four different end products. They then tested it on two mammalian genes that are important in cell mobility, and were able to control the cell's direction and how fast it moved.

Future therapies
The ability to control genes is an attractive approach in designing genetic therapies for complex diseases that involve multiple genes, Qi said, and the new system may overcome several of the challenges of existing experimental therapies.

"Our technique allows us to directly control multiple specific genes and pathways in the genome without expressing new transgenes or uncontrolled behaviors, such as producing too much of a protein, or doing so in the wrong cells," Qi said. "We could eventually synthesize tens of thousands of RNA molecules to control the genome over a whole organism."

Next, Qi plans to test the technique in mice and refine the delivery method. Currently the scientists use a virus to insert the molecule into a cell, but he would eventually like to simply inject the molecules into an organism's blood.

"That is what is so exciting about working at Stanford, because the School of Medicine's immunology group is just around the corner, and working with them will help us address how to do this without triggering an immune response," said Qi, who is a member of the interdisciplinary Stanford ChEM-H institute. "I'm optimistic because everything about this system comes naturally from cells, and should be compatible with any organism."

Source: Stanford university

Researchers silence leading cancer-causing gene

Using bioluminescence, researchers showed that the novel molecule “KRAS silencing RNA” or "KRAS siRNA” (right) reduced the size of a tumor in mice. Researchers used a “non-KRAS silencing” molecule as the control (left) as a comparison. Credit: Image courtesy of University of North Carolina Health Care

Researchers from the UNC School of Medicine and colleagues at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center have developed a new approach to block the KRAS oncogene, one of the most frequently mutated genes in human cancer. The approach, led by Chad Pecot, MD, an assistant professor of medicine at UNC, offers another route to attack KRAS, which has proven to be an elusive and frustrating target for drug developers.

The new method relies upon a specifically sequenced type of small interfering RNA -- or siRNA. The findings, published in the journal Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, show that using a form of siRNA to halt KRAS not only dramatically stunted the growth of lung and colon cancers in cultured cells and mice but also stopped metastasis -- the main cause of cancer deaths.

"KRAS has been widely regarded as an undruggable protein, but we show that that's simply not the case," said Pecot, the study lead author and member of the UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center.

KRAS is a signaling molecule -- a protein switch that triggers a cascade of molecular events that tell cells to grow and survive. Mutations in the KRAS gene create a switch that is perpetually "on," causing cells to divide uncontrollably. KRAS mutations are present in roughly 30 percent of human cancers, particularly lung, colon, pancreatic, and thyroid.

"It is the elephant in the room," Pecot said. "KRAS was one of the first cancer-causing genes ever discovered, and it was the obvious target to go after. People have been trying for decades to hit it, but they haven't had much luck."

Inhibiting KRAS signaling has been tricky because it lacks good pockets or crevices for small molecules and drugs to bind to. Some researchers have tried instead to target the proteins downstream in the KRAS signaling cascade, but those attempts have also had limited success.

Rather than try another conventional approach, Pecot decided to use a new genetic tool known as RNA interference -- or RNAi -- to destroy the KRAS protein before it fully forms. RNAi uses bits of synthetically engineered RNA -- the single-stranded molecule transcribed from DNA -- to silence specific genes. These bits of RNA bind to specific genetic messages called mRNA in the cell and direct enzymes to recognize the messages as enemies. In this context, the enzymes destroyed the genetic messages of KRAS mRNA so that KRAS can't be made. As a result, the cells don't grow, replicate, or move nearly as well.

RNAi has shown great promise in the treatment of liver diseases, viral infections, and cancers. To see if this approach could thwart the KRAS oncogene, Pecot and his colleagues first had to test different sequences of RNA to determine which one most effectively tagged KRAS for destruction. Of five RNA sequences, the researchers identified two candidates worthy to take into cancer models.

When they delivered these sequences into tissue culture cells, they found that the siRNAs destroyed more than 90 percent of the KRAS gene messages, significantly impairing the growth of cancer cell lines. The technique also led to marked reduction of two signaling molecules called pERK and pMEK, which lie downstream of KRAS and have been implicated in cancer cell proliferation and tumor growth.

Next, Pecot and his colleagues tested the siRNAs in mouse models of lung and colon cancer. They wrapped the sequences in protective lipid nanoparticles and delivered the siRNA solution into the mice. The researchers found that this treatment significantly slowed the growth of primary tumors. For example, tumors from colon cancer models that had been treated with the KRAS siRNAs were 69 percent smaller than tumors treated with control RNA sequences.

In addition, the researchers discovered that silencing KRAS stemmed the spread of cancer cells to other organs. The siRNA treatment reduced the number of these secondary malignant growths by about 80 percent in mice with lung cancer and to a similar degree in colon cancer models.

Pecot's findings come on the heels of two other papers using siRNAs to target KRAS, one from Frank McCormick's laboratory at the University of California at San Francisco and the other from Tyler Jacks' laboratory at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. What sets the UNC study apart is that it demonstrates that this approach can be used to control the development of metastatic disease.

"Having all three papers come out at about the same time is encouraging because it means that KRAS is druggable if you use outside-the-box methods," Pecot said. "Now, we essentially have three platforms for targeting KRAS with siRNAs that may get to the clinic."

Pecot said the results, while promising, are just a first step in combating this cancer-causing gene. Ultimately, the siRNA sequences will have to be designed to specifically target the mutant form of KRAS without disrupting the normal form of the gene, which is necessary for maintaining normal growth in healthy cells.

Source: University of North Carolina Health Care

Rewiring metabolism slows colorectal cancer growth

Many cancers have less MPC in them than normal adult tissues. Re-introducing MPC into cancer cells slows growth of tumors following injection into mice as compared to unmanipulated cells. Credit: Ralph DeBerardinis

Cancer is an unwanted experiment in progress. As the disease advances, tumor cells accumulate mutations, eventually arriving at ones that give them the insidious power to grow uncontrollably and spread. Distinguishing drivers of cancer from benign mutations open opportunities for developing targeted cancer therapies.

A University of Utah-led study reports that cancers select against a protein complex called the mitochondrial pyruvate carrier (MPC), and re-introduction of MPC in colon cancer cells impairs several properties of cancer, including growth. The research, which appears online on Oct. 30 in Molecular Cell, implicates changes in a key step in metabolism -- the way cellular fuel is utilized -- as an important driver of colon cancer that is also likely to be important in many other cancer settings.

Cancers appear to do whatever they can to get rid of MPC, a protein involved in carbohydrate metabolism, shows the study led by Jared Rutter, Ph.D., professor of biochemistry and Dee Glen and Ida W. Smith Endowed Chair for Cancer Research at the University of Utah. At least 18 types of cancers -- colon, brain, breast, and liver among them -- have significantly less MPC than normal adult cells. Some cancers simply delete a region of the genome that contains one of the MPC genes, others find different ways to dampen MPC expression. In fact, a survey of patient biopsies shows that the less MPC there is, the more aggressive the cancer becomes.

"Loss of MPC seems to be a biomarker for cancer aggressiveness and patient survival," said Rutter, also co-director of the Diabetes and Metabolism Center at the University of Utah, and co-leader of the Nuclear Control of Cell Growth and Differentiation Program at the Huntsman Cancer Institute. "That was our first clue that MPC might be important."

Even more striking, when Rutter's group reintroduced MPC into colon cancer cell lines, properties that define them as cancerous, reverted. The cells divide less frequently under certain conditions and decrease expression of stem cell markers, an early step frequently defining the potential to form tumors and spread. Further, the engineered cells are dramatically impaired in their ability to form tumors after injection into mice. Tumors containing cells with MPC were as small as one-fourth the size of tumors made from cells without the protein complex.

"We think these results show that elimination of MPC is an early and important step in development of cancer," said John Schell, who is co-first author with Kristofor Olson, both M.D.-Ph.D. students at the University of Utah. "Finding the stem cell connection was probably the most exciting part for us, and is something we'll pursue further to understand how loss of MPC changes cell behavior."

The role of MPC in the normal cell, and what loss of MPC does to a cancer cell, addresses an observation first made nearly one century ago. Nobel Prize-wining biochemist Otto Warburg noted that cancer cells change their metabolism to support uncontrolled growth and proliferation. Scientists later found the way in which the metabolite pyruvate is processed is key to these metabolic changes. In normal adult cells, pyruvate enters the mitochondria, the cell's powerhouse, and fuels energy production. In cancer, pyruvate is diverted from the mitochondria to an alternative metabolic pathway that makes cell-building material.

Scientists had long suspected the so-called Warburg effect seen in cancer was contingent upon controlling entry of pyruvate into the mitochondria. But there was no way to directly test the idea until two years ago, when Rutter's group and others identified MPC as pyruvate's doorway to the mitochondria. The current report in Molecular Cell shows that cancer cells shut that door by repressing MPC, and that experimentally re-opening the door by re-introducing MPC not only inhibits cancer growth, but also redirects pyruvate to the metabolic pathway used in normal cells. In other words, MPC counteracts the Warburg effect.

"This makes sense because MPC is a pinch point in metabolism," said Rutter. "Our work, taken together with that from many other laboratories, shows that most cancer cells are completely reliant on this unusual metabolism known as the Warburg effect."

Understanding the Warburg effect has been an area of intense interest in recent years because of the potential to translate those discoveries into new cancer therapeutics. "We think this information can be used to design therapies that are specifically toxic to cancer cells," said Rutter.

Source: University of Utah Health Sciences